Mass layoff in Germany: Your rights and severance options

Mass dismissal - mass redundancy

A “mass layoff” (Massenentlassung) occurs when an employer of a certain size terminates a specific number of employees. The thresholds are defined in the Dismissal Protection Act. “Layoffs” include all employer-initiated employment terminations – regular dismissals, employee resignations, and termination agreements. Our article explains when a layoff  is legally considered a “mass layoff”, the employer’s special obligations, and your dismissal protection rights.

Free initial consultation with a lawyer

Quick callback after 1 to 2 hours for a free initial consultation with a lawyer

Free initial consultation

Key takeaways:
  • Thresholds for “mass layoffs” depend on company size and the number of people fired, as defined in the Dismissal Protection Act 
  • Dismissals in mass layoffs are regular terminations subject to general and special dismissal protection. 
  • Employers must notify the employment agency and properly involve the works council before proceeding with layoffs.
  • In many cases, employers have to negotiate a “social plan”, which typically provides severance payments.

Important: What does a mass layoff mean for employees? A mass layoff does not automatically make a dismissal invalid. However, when an employer terminates a significant number of employees, additional legal requirements apply. For employees, this can be important because mistakes by the employer during the consultation process, the mass layoff notification, or the employee selection process may provide grounds to challenge the dismissal. Even where a termination is ultimately upheld, such errors can strengthen an employee’s negotiating position and often lead to higher severance payments.

Definition of mass layoff

For employees, a mass layoff is essentially a large-scale dismissal programme that triggers additional legal obligations for the employer. These additional requirements often create opportunities to challenge dismissals or negotiate severance pay.

The definition of mass layoff is based on the Dismissal Protection Act (KSchG), depending on company size:

  • In companies with more than 20 but fewer than 60 employees, more than 5 employees are terminated.
  • In companies with at least 60 but fewer than 500 employees, at least 10% of the workforce or more than 25 employees must be terminated.
  • In companies with at least 500 employees, at least 30 employees are terminated.
  • When counting, not only regular dismissals or modification dismissals by the employer are considered, but also termination agreements or employee resignations initiated by the employer.
  • Not counted are extraordinary dismissals and employee resignations that were not initiated by the employer or have no connection to the mass layoff.

The terminations must occur within a 30 calendar day period.

Tip: Do not assume your dismissal is valid
Many employees assume that a mass layoff automatically follows all legal requirements. In practice, employers frequently make mistakes when selecting employees, consulting the works council or notifying the Employment Agency.
Even if many colleagues receive dismissal letters at the same time, it may still be worth having your individual case reviewed.

Additional employer obligations in mass layoffs

A dismissal in connection with mass layoffs is a “regular” operational dismissal. The employer must therefore observe all requirements of general and special dismissal protection.

Additionally, employers must comply with the Dismissal Protection Act for mass layoffs:

  • The employer must inform the works council in writing about planned measures. This includes: reasons for the planned action, the number and type of affected employees and all staff, the timeline for dismissals, selection criteria for employees to be terminated, and calculation methods for potential severance payments.
  • The employer must consult with the works council with the goal of avoiding dismissals or reducing their number.
  • The employer must notify the employment agency of planned mass layoffs. The notification must contain all details: number/occupational groups of employees to be terminated, regularly employed workers, the period in which dismissals will occur, planned criteria for selecting employees to be terminated, and information about gender, age, occupation, etc. of affected employees.
  • The employer must forward to the employment agency the notification to the works council and the works council’s statement.

Once the employer files notification with the employment agency, a one-month dismissal ban initially applies:

  • After filing with the employment agency, the employer may only terminate within one month with the agency’s consent (Entlassungssperre or “dismissal ban”).1
  • After the one-month dismissal ban expires, the employer may terminate. They must execute announced dismissals within 90 days.
  • If measures are not implemented after 90 days, the employer must go through this procedure again.

Courts have previously ruled that dismissal becomes invalid if the employer filed no notification or a defective notification with the employment agency. This case law is currently under review by the European Court of Justice. The same applies to errors in the consultation procedure with the works council.

Federal Labour Court (BAG):2
The Federal Labour Court confirmed that employers must comply with the statutory mass layoff procedure. Procedural mistakes can create significant legal risks and may affect the validity of dismissals.
Practical takeaway: Employees should not assume that a dismissal is valid simply because many employees are affected.

However, courts maintain that failure to inform/consult the works council under Section 17 of the Dismissal Protection Act cannot be remedied retroactively. Dismissal is invalid in such cases.

Note: If the employer completely omits notification to the employment agency, a retroactive mass layoff notification can currently be filed. However, already terminated employment relationships then continue until expiration of the (retroactive) dismissal ban.

Employer must negotiate social plan with works council

Tip: Social plan payments are often higher than individual negotiations
Works councils usually negotiate severance formulas for all affected employees. Because the works council negotiates collectively, employees often achieve better results than they would in individual negotiations.
If a social plan exists, employees should review it carefully before signing any separate settlement agreement.

Mass layoffs are often part of operational restructuring, per Section 111 of the Works Constitution Act. In such cases, the employer has a duty to negotiate a reconciliation of interests (Interessenausgleich) with the works council (Section 112 of the Works Constitution Act). The reconciliation of interests includes how operational restructuring is implemented (timing, number of dismissals, etc.). However, there’s no obligation to conclude one. If negotiations fail, the employer can unilaterally implement measures.

Unlike a reconciliation of interests, the employer must negotiate and conclude a social plan with the works council if the legal requirements are met. If negotiations fail, a conciliation board can impose a binding solution.
The social plan is one of the most important protections available to employees during a mass layoff or restructuring. It aims to reduce the financial impact of job losses by providing severance payments and compensation for economic disadvantages. Depending on the circumstances, employees may also receive compensation for lost benefits, occupational pension disadvantages, relocation costs, or increased commuting expenses.

Is severance paid after a mass layoff?

From an employee’s perspective, dismissal due to mass layoff is a “regular” dismissal subject to general and special dismissal protection. Mass layoffs merely create additional and higher hurdles for employers.

Severance claims in mass layoffs therefore follow general considerations:

  • Under Section 1a of the Dismissal Protection Act, employees have a statutory claim to severance of 0.5 gross monthly salaries per year of employment for operational dismissal if they don’t file a dismissal protection lawsuit and the employer indicated this option in the dismissal letter.
  • Severance claims can result from voluntary negotiations with the employer. The result is then agreed in either a termination agreement or court settlement.

However, in mass layoffs, severance claims from a social plan are far more significant. When certain requirements are met, law mandates that employers conclude a social plan (contract) with the works council to mitigate the social and economic impacts of dismissals for affected employees. Because the works council has a stronger negotiating position compared to individual employees, this typically results in better severance payments.

Short answer: Yes many employees receive severance pay after mass layoff.
A mass layoff does not automatically create a severance claim. However, employers often negotiate severance payments through social plans, settlement agreements or dismissal protection proceedings.

Frequently asked questions

Kostenlose Erstberatung mit Anwalt
Free initial consultation with a specialist lawyer
  • Free initial consultation with a lawyer
  • Quick callback after 1 to 2 hours
  • Strategy for negotiating the severance pay

Free initial consultation

  1. Section 18 of the Dismissal Protection Act ↩︎
  2. Federal Labour Court – 13 June 2019 – 6 AZR 459/18 ↩︎

Timo Sauer Avatar

Timo Sauer

Managing Director & Co-Founder, AbfindungsHero Diplom-Betriebswirt (FH)

Timo Sauer is an economist and Co-Founder of AbfindungsHero. As Managing Director, he has helped build the platform into a trusted resource for employees facing terminations and severance negotiations in Germany. His focus lies on settlement agreements, unfair dismissal protection, and practical legal education from the employee's perspective.

Areas of Expertise: Expert in severance negotiation from an employee perspective, company building in the legal tech sector, digital legal education, legal content & consumer awareness

All information on our website is of an editorial nature and expressly does not constitute legal advice. Naturally, we have made every effort to ensure the accuracy of the information and links contained on this website. Nevertheless, we cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information. It is in no way a substitute for legal advice from a lawyer.